Developing and testing a new outcome measure.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Kathryn E. Roach, PhD, PT; Alison A. Linberg, DPT, ATC; Michele A. Raya, PhD, PT, SCS, ATC Health outcome measures are used to assess treatment effectiveness. Historically, survival was the most important health outcome. Treatments were assessed based on whether the patient lived or died. Now in the 21st century, treatments for many injuries and illnesses are so effective that many, if not most, patients survive. If patients survive, the quality of their survival becomes an important health outcome. The severity of impairments in body structure (limb loss) and function (weakness) are one way to assess the quality of survival. However, from the perspective of the patient, discomfort and disability are probably more important health outcomes. Limitation in mobility activities is an important component of disability, particularly for individuals with lower-limb loss (LLL). The treatment effectiveness of the rehabilitative care provided to servicemembers with LLL should be assessed by examining its effect on mobility limitations. Unfortunately, it is much more difficult to accurately measure mobility limitations than it is to measure survival. Measurement requires developing a set of rules to assign numbers to represent a concept or health outcome. When outcome measures contain multiple items, rules must also be developed to combine item scores to generate total and subscale scores. Determining the set of rules that will best represent a particular health outcome is affected by both the reason for measuring the outcome and the types of individuals being measured. Outcome measures can be used to examine small changes resulting from a treatment or to place individuals into broad categories. The purpose for using the outcome measure will dictate the types of items selected and the measurement dimension attached to these items. Measures of mobility activity limitations can be either performance-based or self-report. The types of individuals being measured will often determine which approach is best. A performance-based outcome measure requires both a set of rules for performing the test and a set of rules for scoring the test. It is not enough to simply create an outcome measure. It is essential to determine whether the rules used to create the outcome measure work to consistently and accurately represent the concept being measured.
منابع مشابه
Developing new methods to monitor phase II fuzzy linear profiles
In some quality control applications, the quality of a process or a product is described by the relationship between a response variable and one or more explanatory variables, called a profile. Moreover, in most practical applications, the qualitative characteristic of a product/service is vague, uncertain and linguistic and cannot be precisely stated. The purpose of this paper is to propose a ...
متن کاملDevelopment of a multiple sclerosis functional composite as a clinical trial outcome measure.
The primary clinical outcome measure for evaluating multiple sclerosis in clinical trials has been Kurtzke's expanded disability status scale (EDSS). New therapies appear to favourably impact the course of multiple sclerosis and render continued use of placebo control groups more difficult. Consequently, future trials are likely to compare active treatment groups which will most probably requir...
متن کاملComparability of Computer-based and Paper-based Versions of Writing Section of PET in Iranian EFL Context
Computer technology has provided language testing experts with opportunity to develop computerized versions of traditional paper-based language tests. New generations of TOEFL and Cambridge IELTS, BULATS, KET, PET are good examples of computer-based language tests. Since this new method of testing introduces new factors into the realm of language assessment ( e.g. modes of test delivery, famili...
متن کاملFrom Mid-Level Policy Analysis to Macro-Level Political Economy; Comment on “Developing a Framework for a Program Theory-Based Approach to Evaluating Policy Processes and Outcomes: Health in All Policies in South Australia”
This latest contribution by the evaluation research team at Flinders University/Southgate Institute on their multiyear study of South Australia’s Health in All Policies (HiAP) initiative is simultaneously frustrating, exemplary, and partial. It is frustrating because it does not yet reveal the extent to which the initiative achieved its stated outcomes; that awaits further papers. It is exempla...
متن کاملMapping of McGraw Cycle to RUP Methodology for Secure Software Developing
Designing a secure software is one of the major phases in developing a robust software. The McGraw life cycle, as one of the well-known software security development approaches, implements different touch points as a collection of software security practices. Each touch point includes explicit instructions for applying security in terms of design, coding, measurement, and maintenance of softwar...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of rehabilitation research and development
دوره 50 7 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013